What does this mean for brands?
Shorter tenures shouldn’t automatically viewed as instability anymore. You’ll miss out on great talent if you don’t give candidates the chance to share their why.
We can testify that there are so many gems to be found with shorter tenures – it’s about creating a workplace and career ladder that makes them want to stay. In many cases, we’re seeing shorter tenures reflect ambition, adaptability and a desire to expand capability.
We’re still looking for considered tenures in roles and workplaces, but we’re encouraging brands to be more open to interviewing candidates who have moved companies consistently in 12 – 18 month periods, because the average tenure truly has shortened.
What does this mean for candidates?
If you’re someone who has shuffled employers more regularly than every 2 years, be considered in your interview preparation. You’ll be asked why you moved on from each role, because employers care about loyalty, and it’s a fair question to be aske.
Ahead of your interview, prepare your answers as to why you chose to move from role to role and let it play out as a strength, not a weakness in the way that you operate.
In an ideal world, we still love to see longer tenures leading candidates to stay with a brand far beyond 2 years. Take your commitment to growth with one business beyond 4 or 5 years, and you’re the unicorn candidate we’re all searching for in 2026.
So should you be jumping employers every 12 months?
We don’t think so. Loyalty is still important and in most cases, to give yourself the opportunity to grow, you want to work in a year-on-year capacity to improve the results you drive for a brand,
That being said, a decision to move companies should be based on the opportunities in front of you. Which elevates your career the most and gets you closer to that ultimate career goal? The decision is yours, angel.
With love,
Lauren x